We are going to conduct a very rigorous review for the articles submitted for the Conference. How we are going to conduct the review process is following:
At this first stage, the Conference Chairs will decide if article are suitable for the conference, asking questions such as:
The editor will find and contact 2or 3 other researchers or academics (technical committee members or form outside of the same) who are experts in the same field. They will be asked to review your article, and advise the Conference Chairs with their valuable comments. So what are the reviewers are looking for? This depends on the subject area, but they will be checking that your work is:
The authors will be given the feedback about their article, telling them if any changes need to be made before it can be published. Our authors tell us that the reviewers' comments can be extremely helpful, ensuring that the article is of a high quality. Please note the final editorial decision on a paper and the choice of who to invite to review is always at the Conference Chairs's discretion.
The authors can amend their article based on the reviewers' comments and resubmitting it with changes made.
And that's it, authors made it through peer review. Next stop is publication.
Every article submitted for publication in ICAICR-2019 has been through peer review; its quality, validity, and relevance assessed by independent peers within the relevant field. We believe in the integrity of peer review.